Some ideas to guide our discussion:
- performance and stardom
- artistic value
- decay and degradation
- names and identity
Some additional questions:
- Regarding the relative value of different types of art, I wonder how you feel about the distinction between art that EDIFIES vs. art that DEGRADES. Do some forms of art lift us higher and other forms of art pull us lower? Isn't the performance art of Randy and Cassidy degrading in some way, based on how it effects an audience and what it requires the performer to do?
- And a follow-up question: Does the film The Wrestler qualify as art the edifies or art that degrades? I mean, do audiences of this film have an opportunity to reach a higher plane of understanding, or maybe a more sophisticated level of insight into the human condition? Is this engagement worthwhile? Of course, the alternative is to look at the film as a type of pornography or base sentimentality that offers a quick and easy release of tension. How do you experience the film? Is director asking us to compare his own film with the type of art that his characters perform? Is stripping pornography? Is the crude ballet of professional wrestling a type of pornography?
- How do you take the ending of the film? Does The Wrestler qualify as a tragedy in the academic sense of the term?
- When Randy quits his job at the grocery store, is he really just quitting his job? What precipitates his outburst?